Archive for March, 2009
We’ll Try
We recently got some questions about the story “We’ll Try”. Send us your questions!
The article assumes that the deadline is fixed and that the client should trade off the project objectives. It seems to ignore the possibility that there are other things the client might want to trade off such as cost and deadline or more complex issues like aspects of quality such as maintainability, flexibility, reliability, usability, etc.
Quality Assurance
A very experienced QA manager recently emailed me some tough questions. Here they are, with are my answers. As always, comments and further questions are welcome!
Absence of Errors
You XP guys advocate testing, not inspections or program proofs. Everyone knows that testing can only show that errors exist, not that they don’t.
Tradeoffs
We have Worst Things First, which tells us what to worry about. On the other hand, our division of responsibilities tells us that the customer decides which stories to work on. Does WTF only apply within the particular story we have in hand now, or do we somehow exercise programmer forethought in deciding what we need to worry about?
Optional Scope Contracts
Article by Kent Beck and Dave Cleal offering an alternative to fixed-price contracts.
Distributed Computing
The Distributed Computing link lets you get a copy of the C3 team’s famous article in Distributed Computing.
Kate Oneal
Here, in order, are the online chapters of Annals of Kate Oneal
CSM Plus
Chet and I are finalizing prep for our upcoming CSM Plus course in Birmingham, Michigan, March 31 thru April 2. Chet is ordering the handouts right now. We had copies at the Scrum Gathering in Orlando, and they look great.…














