<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>xProgramming.com</title>
	<link>http://xprogramming.com</link>
	<description>an agile software development resource</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 15:53:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	<!-- generator="WordPress/3.0" -->

	<item>
		<title>Beyond Agile: New Principles?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Some people have difficulty living up to the values and principles of the Agile Manifesto. Should we improve the Manifesto? Raise your game: we meant what we said.]]></description>
		<link>http://xprogramming.com/articles/beyond-agile-new-principles/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Contradiction: Test Everything, but not Accessors?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[At the Agile Developer Skills course at the Raikes School, I commented that we don't usually test accessors. But we test everything. Is this a contradiction?]]></description>
		<link>http://xprogramming.com/articles/contradiction-test-everything-but-not-accessors/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Scala &#8230; a failing test</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Jon Bettinger has found a failing test! Excellent!]]></description>
		<link>http://xprogramming.com/articles/scala-a-failing-test/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Scala Bowling … building on Philip’s approach</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Philip Schwarz provided a nice-looking implementation. Let's look at it and try to build on his ideas.]]></description>
		<link>http://xprogramming.com/articles/scala-bowling-reconstructing-philips-approach/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Scala Bowling … more function cowbell</title>
		<description><![CDATA[My critiXXXXX advisors expected a more function-oriented solution. Here's something a bit better, perhaps ...]]></description>
		<link>http://xprogramming.com/articles/scala-bowling-more-function-cowbell/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Scala Bowling, I think …</title>
		<description><![CDATA[I've been working with Scala a bit, just to learn what it is. I've found it interesting, if frustrating. Here is a bowling experiment.]]></description>
		<link>http://xprogramming.com/articles/scala-bowling-i-think/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Scala Confusion</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Just for something to do, I'm learning? Scala. Having deep confusion making JUnit suites run. Advise me in comments if you're up for it?]]></description>
		<link>http://xprogramming.com/articles/scala-confusion/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Beyond Agile: Synthesis</title>
		<description><![CDATA["His brand is bad: my brand is good." Isn't it well past time we got over that kind of thinking? I'll take a good idea from anywhere. So should you.]]></description>
		<link>http://xprogramming.com/articles/beyond-agile-synthesis/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Getting to Safety</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Should we ease into Agile, or jump in? How fond of being eaten by bears are you?]]></description>
		<link>http://xprogramming.com/articles/getting-to-safety/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Can doing something anti-Agile be more effective?</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Let's consider two "dimensions" of a project, the extent to which it adheres to "Agile" values, and the extent to which it is an effective or successful project.]]></description>
		<link>http://xprogramming.com/articles/can-doing-something-anti-agile-be-more-effective/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
